63 pages • 2 hours read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Ernie rounds everyone up. Taking in Ernie’s bloody, dirty appearance, Simone makes a quip about a “[p]erilous third act” (267). Brooke tries to make an excuse for being in Fulton’s room, but Fulton tells her that Ernie already knows they’re mother and daughter. The only people Ernie doesn’t rouse are Veronica and her two companions. Inside the bar car, Hatch is interviewing Douglas and tries to stop everyone from coming in. Ernie tells him that this is a writers’ festival and that he’s about to hold a speaking event of his own, to announce his upcoming book: Everyone on This Train Is a Suspect. Ernie asks Hatch whether he has a gun and how many pairs of handcuffs he has with him. Hatch says that he has a Taser and two pairs of handcuffs. Ernie says, “[T]hat’ll have to do” (268), and tells Hatch to arrest Alan Royce.
When Royce protests that he didn’t kill anyone, Ernie clarifies that he’s accusing Royce of helping Wyatt to cover up McTavish’s crime against Fulton. He explains what happened in Edinburgh and accuses Royce (when working as a lab tech) of arranging for the DNA evidence to be compromised, in exchange for a book deal from Wyatt. When he reveals that Brooke is McTavish’s daughter and summarizes her upsetting encounters with McTavish aboard the train, Brooke likewise protests that she didn’t kill anyone. Royce breaks down and admits his guilt. Hatch cuffs him to a chair. As Ernie resumes his summation of motives, Hatch asks, “Does it usually take this long?” and the writers all answer, “Yes” (273). Ernie cryptically comments that his agent is in the room and that because she has done so much “behind the scenes” on behalf of his new book (273), he wants to make sure to do everything right. Ernie reviews Majors’s motive: She was angry about McTavish stealing her story to use in Off the Rails. He explains that Majors grew up near Alice Springs and attended the same school as the children killed in the Ghan accident. She confirms this and adds that she was home sick that day. The girl whom the bus driver molested was her best friend, Anna. Ernie explains how Douglas, too, is connected to this incident and that he came aboard the Ghan intending to kill McTavish, but someone else beat him to it. Ernie reminds everyone that the weapon that killed Wyatt was a Gemini pen. He turns to Wolfgang and asks him how interactive his The Death of Literature art project actually is.
Ernie explains that the intent of Wolfgang’s project is to critique commercial fiction and humiliate Wyatt. When Wolfgang explained the project to Wyatt and said that he was going to unveil it on the train, Wyatt tried to write him a check to stop the project, but Wolfgang refused it. Wolfgang—not Douglas—is actually Erica Mathison. He invited Veronica and her friends on the trip as an audience for his revelation that not only is Erica not real, but her books are also written by artificial intelligence. Hatch points out that this development gives Wyatt a motive to kill Wolfgang, but not the other way around. Ernie agrees and adds that Wolfgang inadvertently provided a crucial clue in solving the mystery: One of Wolfgang’s criticisms of McTavish was that he overused commas—particularly the Oxford comma. However, the title of McTavish’s latest manuscript is Life, Death and Whiskey, which omits the Oxford comma. Therefore, McTavish isn’t the real author of this manuscript: Jasper has been ghostwriting for McTavish.
Like the other section titles, the Part 6 title, “Literary,” works on multiple levels, and like the preceding five section titles, it refers to one of the writers onboard the Ghan. In this case, the reference is to Wolfgang, who writes literary novels and is working on an art project designed to prove their superiority to commercial fiction. The title also refers to a literary trope and a literary panel of sorts: Ernie rounds up writers, an agent, and several fans for a classic golden-age-mystery-style denouement—and also, he jokes, to announce his new book, Everyone on This Train Is a Suspect.
The title of Part 7, “The Seven Deductions of Ernest Cunningham,” is a callback to Simone’s comment about trendy “first-name-last-name” books containing numbers in their titles (181). This joke, as a form of internal allusion, has a metafictional function. In addition, this section is literally about the deductions that Ernie has made about seven characters: Royce, Fulton, Brooke, Majors, Douglas, Wolfgang, and Jasper. Part 7 fulfills the traditional golden-age-mystery function of a public denouement of the evidence that builds to a climax when the solution is finally announced. This allows readers to check each of their own deductions, to understand how traditional mystery elements like red herrings may have been used to misdirect them, to understand how the genuine clues fit into the overall puzzle, and to continue “playing along” up until the last moment. It’s an important part of the “fair-play” ethos that Ernie endorses throughout the book and is part of the fun of reading a mystery.
This traditional form of denouement is uncommon in contemporary mysteries, however, as it’s seen as clumsy and unrealistic. The extended analysis inherent in such a scene draws attention to the mystery’s composition, pulling readers out of a novel’s pretend world. In addition, the gathering of suspects for a long speech can seem uncomfortably artificial to modern readers. That both Royce and Ernie insist on holding a denouement gathering is a thematic commentary on The Foibles of Literary Culture and Authorial Ego; none of the characters except Hatch, a “real” detective, minds the lengthy exposition and recapping of the action. The more literary characters apparently assume that their detective, Ernie, has earned the right to an audience for his ideas, much as authors of golden-age mysteries might have assumed that the hard work of composition earns one the right to this kind of denouement as an opportunity to showcase a carefully constructed plot. In Everyone on This Train Is a Suspect, the inclusion of a careful deconstruction of the plot is doubly important because it supports the theme of Language as a Tool to Manipulate Perception: Ernie’s speech is an opportunity to understand how, throughout the novel, characters have blurred the line between truth and fiction through lies, half-truths, and misdirection.
The discussion of Wolfgang’s art project, The Death of Literature, in Chapter 34 also bolsters these themes. Wolfgang’s project examines the supposed divide between “high” and “low” art; alluding to the theme of The Foibles of Literary Culture and Authorial Ego, he ostensibly shores up his own authorial ego by proving that commercial fiction is worthless drivel that even a machine can write. His creation of Erica Mathison and her work exemplifies the theme of Language as a Tool to Manipulate Perception and shows how fuzzy the boundaries can become between the “real” and the “unreal.”
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Benjamin Stevenson
Books & Literature
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Education
View Collection
Good & Evil
View Collection
Guilt
View Collection
Laugh-out-Loud Books
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
Revenge
View Collection
Trust & Doubt
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection