37 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
The book’s main focus is on the moral ambiguity of chattel slavery and how the sexual element of Celia’s case forces the people around her to confront the morality of slavery with regard to rape. The moral ambiguity results from trying to hold in place two opposing beliefs: the first is that owning human beings like chattel is a reasonable (and necessary) practice, and the second is that all people, regardless of their status as free or enslaved, have an inviolable right to life. These two notions will inevitably cause conflict, because an inviolable right to life must, by extension, entail some basic ownership of one’s own body, and the body of a slave in America’s “peculiar institution” cannot have two owners. The inherent moral ambiguity of slavery is also what eventually leads to its downfall; tragically, the dissolution of slavery is a long and violent process, and Celia is one of its many victims.
Related to moral ambiguity is the question of how the legal system participated in the perpetuation of slavery and how it was used to smooth over the moral disruptions caused by its reality and make slavery appear morally tenable. This is illustrated, McLaurin observes, in the procedural correctness of Celia’s trial, which gives the appearance that her basic human rights were being met, but covers up the messy reality of her sexual exploitation and its bearing on her actions. Slavery, of course, is not the only context in which the “letter of the law” can give the appearance of rightness to unethical or immoral behavior, but it is especially important given its far-reaching effects on American society.
The question of the sexual vulnerability of female slaves and the ways that gender and race oppression intersect is key to understanding how Celia’s story illustrates an important aspect of slavery—that of the relative degree of agency (if any) that could be claimed by enslaved women. Given the details of his case study, McLaurin’s conclusion is bleak. Although Celia does, indeed, kill her oppressor, she does so accidentally and/or at the behest of (or in cooperation with) her lover, rather than as a way of claiming her own agency. Had she had any recourse to protect herself from Newsom to begin with, or been allowed to mount a defense based on the truth of her motive rather than the just the facts of her actions, she might be seen having some agency. As it is, she is completely powerless.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: