57 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Laurel Thatcher Ulrich is an American historian, writer, and activist. In 2018, she became the 300th Anniversary University Professor, Emerita at Harvard University. Ulrich was born in Sugar City, Idaho, in 1938. She earned her BA in English and Journalism from the University of Utah before completing a master’s in English from Simmons University. She then earned a PhD in history from the University of New Hampshire, where she taught as a professor for 15 years. She then became James Duncan Phillips Professor of Early American History and director of the Charles Warren Center of Studies in American History at Harvard University. She is the author of six nonfiction books about history, with a special interest in both American history and feminist history. Ulrich is also a practicing member of the Church of Latter-Day Saints and has written and conducted research into the Mormon religion through a feminist lens. Beyond the awards she garnered for A Midwife’s Tale, she became a MacArthur Fellow in 1992, and earned the Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. Award from the Society of American Historians, in addition to the Charles Frankel Award.
In one of her scholarly papers in 1976 about Puritan funeral services, Ulrich wrote the sentence that has since become a wildly popular feminist slogan: “Well-behaved women seldom make history” (Lavoie, Amy. “Ulrich explains that well-behaved women should make history,” The Harvard Gazette, 7 Sept. 2007). Ulrich’s intended meaning was that historians rarely studied well-behaved women, not necessarily that modern-day women should push back or rebel, though certainly Ulrich would not disagree with such a sentiment. Ulrich harnessed the popularity of the statement and wrote a feminist history book titled Well-Behaved Women Seldom Make History that examines the myriad ways women have shaped history and historical narratives.
As a feminist historian, Ulrich is uniquely positioned to tell Martha Ballard’s story with both compassion and understanding, as well as the research abilities to undertake a project steeped in the oftentimes challenging methodology of microhistory. Ulrich’s English background (in which she completed her BA and MA) also gives her a literary edge to complete a history book rife with language that is engaging and at times lyrical.
Martha Ballard is the most important figure in A Midwife’s Tale, as she is the titular midwife. Born in Oxford, Massachusetts in 1735, she was educated enough to both read and write and was trained, likely through practical application, in the ways of midwifery and medicine. While living in Oxford, Martha did not record any midwifery practice, as midwives were typically older, established women in the community. However, after the family moved north to Hallowell, Maine, Martha began her midwifery practice, as she was one of the older, more established women in their new location. Martha also began her diary around this time, starting perhaps as an almanac of the weather or ledger of births attended, but eventually growing and transforming into a daily ritual of recording her life as she experienced it.
Martha’s religion plays an important role in her diary. A devout Christian, much of her worldview is informed by the idea of God and God’s control over the events of her life. In times of illness, financial hardship, or family strife, Martha turns to prayer on the pages of her diary, pleading with God to give her strength and patience to carry on. In moments of religious fervor, Martha’s inner life becomes clarified and her vulnerability shines through. While much of the diary is nearly objective and detached, as she aged, she became more open about feeling overwhelmed by the work required of her as both midwife and housewife.
Martha had nine children with her husband, Ephraim, a number that was not unusual for the time and culture as much of the New England economy was reliant on family labor. Large families with an even balance of sons and daughters were conducive to a productive family economy. The Ballards had an even number of sons and daughters, after the death of three of their daughters during the diphtheria outbreak in Oxford in 1769. By the end of 1779, they had three sons—Cyrus, Jonathan, and Ephraim—and three daughters: Lucy, Hannah, and Dolly. This even number of children allowed for both Ephraim and Martha to successfully run their respective aspects of their household, with Ephraim and the boys working on the mills and in the fields, and Martha and the girls working with textiles and other domestic chores, at least until the girls married and left home.
Martha’s role as a midwife positioned her uniquely in the community as a bridge between the spheres of men and women in the realm of healthcare. She was the first one called for a woman in labor, but occasionally she called for a doctor if there was a dire emergency during her visit. The male doctors had respect for her work, though they thought themselves superior to midwives due to their gender and social standing. Still, Martha’s presence even in situations that required a doctor (which happened on numerous occasions, as Drs. Cony and Page are mentioned in several Martha’s diary entries) allowed for better care of her patients, as Martha was more familiar with midwifery and the experiences of womanhood.
Martha died in June 1812 and worked as a midwife into the last month of her life at 77 years old, demonstrating an unwavering dedication to her vocation and her compassionate care for her community. At the end of her life, she also dedicated herself to her garden, cultivating a number of plants that grew fruit, vegetables, herbs, and flowers, some of which likely had medicinal uses, but all of which gave her satisfaction and fulfilled her urge to nurture, the very personality trait that likely guided her toward midwifery.
Ephraim Ballard was Martha’s husband. A land surveyor, he was the first of the family to leave Massachusetts for Maine in 1775. His job often took him away for days, or even weeks, at a time, leaving Martha and the children to complete the household work in his absence. In addition to land surveying, Ephraim also worked at the mills near the family house, planted crops for the farm, and assisted Martha in the textile economy by providing the tools necessary for the women to weave. Ephraim also served in several town positions, such as town clerk and selectman. During the American Revolution, Ephraim had a reputation as a Tory (British loyalist), but not a reputation strong enough to damage his social standing when the Americans won the war.
Martha’s entries suggest that she and Ephraim had a good marriage overall, but when Martha became more fatigued and ill in the late 1790s-early 1800s, her diary expresses her resentment toward him. Since the diary is entirely from Martha’s perspective, Ephraim’s feelings are largely unclear. Martha, in moments of heightened emotion, cast him as unsympathetic to her plight, or perhaps oblivious.
Ephraim’s time in debtor’s jail also negatively impacted Martha’s life. As town tax collector, the job he obtained when he wanted to stop land surveying due to rising attacks on land surveyors from settlers, he was responsible for collecting the taxes of the town, but he fell short by $800. The town had no choice but to jail him for the deficit. The debtor’s jail had little security, and Ephraim was even allowed to leave during the day to work. His absence was difficult for Martha, as she had no man around to cut wood for her, and Ephraim’s absence led to Jonathan and Sally taking over his and Martha’s house. Ephraim survived Martha, eventually dying in 1821 at the age of 96.
Jonathan Ballard was Martha and Ephraim Ballard’s second-oldest son. Named after Martha’s brother, Preacher Jonathan Moore, Jonathan was born in 1760 and survived the diphtheria epidemic in Oxford in 1769 that killed three of his sisters. While unmarried and living at home, Jonathan worked with his father at the mills, even helping to rebuild them after they burned down in 1787. By 1791, Jonathan was working at other men’s mills to earn a living and to spend some time living elsewhere. In 1792, Jonathan married Sally Pierce after she delivered their son out of wedlock. Whether Jonathan wanted to marry Sally is unclear, but due to the paternity laws, he was obligated to. He and Sally had many children and a seemingly successful marriage. Jonathan also serves as an example that despite the illegality of “fornication,” if the father took responsibility for the child and provided support to or married the mother, few people were prosecuted for the crime.
Within the family, Jonathan functioned more in the archetypal oldest son’s role, given that his older brother Cyrus never married; Jonathan and his family took care of Martha and Ephraim in their old age. However, Jonathan appears throughout Martha’s diary as a pseudo-antagonist. He caused “scenes” that upset Martha, fighting with neighbors and speaking “indecently” to Martha. He also moved his family into Martha’s house after Ephraim’s imprisonment, which greatly angered Martha. Nonetheless, Jonathan managed to obtain 200 acres of farmland, growing to over 348 acres by 1800. Though he occasionally spent a few nights in debtor’s jail due to accrued debts, he was able to either obtain the funds or be rescued by someone else. By the end of Martha’s life and the end of the diary, Martha seemed to have made peace with Jonathan and Sally, despite the years of conflict due to their tenuous cohabitation.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Birth & Rebirth
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Health & Medicine
View Collection
Memory
View Collection
Pulitzer Prize Fiction Awardees &...
View Collection
Required Reading Lists
View Collection
Women's Studies
View Collection